The latest smug 'truth', sanguinely delivered as a 'calm' and 'rational' balm to the 'outrageous' nonsense vomited by 'know-nothings' and 'alarmists', is
"this is better than the alternative".
As if "the alternative" isn't moral terror baiting slop, flambéed tableside like Hell's best baked Alaska serves seductive lipstick wearing pig because of course it does!
How to Serve We the People
A lot of what appears to be 'organized' as 'civil disobedience' today is not civil disobedience and importantly, this 'version' of 'civil disobedience' is not solving problems.
Not to rain on a parade;
or kill a moment;
or spit in the face of spirit;
but 'parades' and 'moments' and 'spirits' that lean into performative and theatrical noise are not nonviolent paths towards change.
*
While some protests are acts of civil disobedience, many 'protests' are outlets where we vent our outrages, violations, injustices, etc.
Needless to say, the difference between the latter and the former is the latter serves our feelings; the former serves our cause.
*
If our cause is cruelty and harm -
then our 'protests' may be mobs pretending to exercise 'a right to assemble';
if our cause is change -
then we cannot be what we oppose.
We cannot embody cruelty like an administration that despises human rights as unnatural demonic inventions. Nor can we represent harm like an administration that gilds wrongdoing in its name with gross legalistic license.
This is why nonviolence powerfully serves a cause of change - while never serving a cause of cruelty or harm.
*
Moreover, if our cause is change, nonviolence alone is not how change is achieved. Because nonviolence alone is not a revolution.
*
Nonviolent acts of civil disobedience, on the other hand -
nonviolent solutions that invite everyone to agree to an alternative to ideological callousness and indifference and unwholesome calculations of state-sponsored harm -
nonviolent stands of a plurality of people, altogether aligned against the myth that a duck isn't a duck if it denies being a duck -
that is more than a spectacle;
that is more than a reaction;
that is more than a gesture;
that is how our cause rejects the hypnotic thrall of moral terror baiting slop and seductive lipstick wearing piggery to serve we the people.
More
We live in a reality that values policies of appeasement throughout every sphere of life and living.
Which is to say, to be human is to tolerate at best and champion at worst: normative placidity, bottomless pools of optimism, and of course, loyalty and surrender.
*
It goes without saying that this reality is not a kingdom that values courage,
or change,
or freedom to believe in a secular terra worth fighting for,
or the like.
*
Such that when the price for real world peace is to be meek and mute multitudes of this kingdom -
this isn't peace;
this is real world capitulation;
for what?
for who?
*
As if we live in a reality enchanted by illusions of policies of appeasement delivering big beautiful real world bubbles! like Hell's best baked Alaska serves the truth!
M
You know, I’ve spent a lot of my life looking at the American landscape, both the literal land and the character of the people who walk it. And there’s a pattern you see when things start to go south. It’s a quiet sort of erosion.
ReplyDeleteWe often talk about tyrants as if they just drop out of the sky, fully formed. But that’s not how it works. A tyrant only has as much power as the people are willing to hand over in exchange for a little comfort or the illusion of safety.
When citizens start making excuses for a leader who tramples the truth, when they decide to look the other way because their side is winning, that’s not playing the game. That’s appeasement. And history tells us, in a pretty unforgiving voice, that you can’t feed a wolf your neighbors and expect it not to come for you eventually.
It’s easy to stay quiet when your own backyard is still green. But democracy isn't a spectator sport; you don't get to just sit in the stands and watch the foundation crumble.
We must be better stewards of our freedom than that. Integrity isn't something you can just pick up and put down when it’s convenient. If we’re going to call ourselves free people, we must have the grit to stand up to power, especially when that power claims to be on our side. Because once you give an inch to a tyrant, you’re not just losing your rights, you’re losing your soul.
And once that’s gone, there isn't a mountain in the world high enough to hide in.
Many would see the truth buried in the ground. For centuries, we lived within a peace that was nothing more than a gilded cage, a policy of appeasement that required us to be mute while the world we loved was bled dry. To call cruelty rational and harm better than the alternative is the oldest trick in a tyrant's book. Real change is not found in the performative noise of the streets, nor in the comfort of surrender. It is found in the cold, clear-eyed refusal to believe the lie that our survival depends on our silence. We are not meek multitudes to be managed; we are the storm that follows the calm. A necessary reminder that true service to the people begins by calling a monster by its name.
ReplyDeleteThe Social Contract, as envisioned by thinkers like Rousseau and Locke, rests on a simple trade: the citizen yields certain liberties to the state in exchange for the impartial protection of rights and the promotion of the common good.
ReplyDeleteWhen corruption takes hold, the state stops being a protector and becomes a predator. This shift triggers a collapse starting with the death of legitimacy, the normalization of disobediance, and the shift from authority to coercion.
Legitimacy is the soft power that allows a government to function without a soldier on every corner. When citizens see elites bypassing the law with impunity while they themselves are squeezed by a growing police state the psychological bond breaks. People stop seeing the law as a moral obligation and start seeing it as an obstacle to be bypassed.
As the state’s corruption becomes more blatant, disobedience evolves from a fringe radicalism into a civic duty. Why fund a treasury that only serves the few? Citizens stop using state-regulated systems, creating black markets for everything from goods to information. The brightest minds stop serving the government, leading to a brain drain that leaves only the most sycophantic (and often incompetent) in power.
To compensate for the loss of voluntary compliance, the corrupt government inevitably doubles down on surveillance and force. This is the Police State pivot. However, history teaches us that coercion is incredibly expensive. An empire that must spend its entire budget on monitoring its own people eventually lacks the resources to maintain its infrastructure or defend its borders.
An empire does not usually fall because of an external invasion; it falls because it becomes a hollow shell. When the citizens no longer believe in the, "We," the social fabric unravels. The state becomes a giant with clay feet, imposing in appearance, but incapable of standing when the first real crisis hits.
Corruption is the acid that dissolves the glue of society. Once the social contract is shredded, the people don't just disobey; they depart mentally, economically, and eventually, physically leaving the empire to collapse under its own hollow weight.
OH, LOOK AT THIS! LOOK AT THIS! Someone finally sat down, took a breath, and wrote something that makes SENSE, which is why, of course, it’ll be treated like a hand-drawn map of Atlantis by the people in charge!
ReplyDeleteIt is SHOCKING. It is absolutely STUNNING that we have reached a point in history where, “Hey, maybe the government should actually WORK FOR THE PEOPLE PAYING FOR IT,” is considered a radical, out-there concept!
We’ve got a social contract that’s being used as a piece of scratch paper by a bunch of corrupt, power-tripping bureaucrats who couldn't find the public good if it was stapled to their foreheads! They build a police state, they sharpen the surveillance, they watch us like we’re all suspicious toddlers in a china shop, and then they have the AUDACITY—the unmitigated GALL to wonder why we’re a little 'disobedient!
NEWSFLASH, GENIUSES: When you stop serving the people and start managing them like cattle, We the People becomes a WE ARE OUT OF HERE!
This post hits the nail so hard on the head that the nail is currently orbiting Saturn. You want to avoid fascism? You want to stop the empire from crumbling into a pile of overpriced dust? Then stop treating the Bill of Rights like a Terms and Conditions agreement that nobody reads before clicking Accept!
Your aim is legendarily perfect. The state is supposed to be the waiter, not the guy eating your dinner while he stares at you through a thermal imaging camera! Read it. Learn it. Or don’t! But don’t act surprised when the whole thing falls over because you forgot who was holding up the floor!
I liked you... better when you... were just angry... and made less... sense. Welcome to... the party and... a Great Awakening!
DeleteI’m a man of the people. I love people. I’ve even met a few of them! Usually when someone talks about serving the people, they’re either running for City Council or they’re a cookbook author with a very dark sense of humor. But you are digging into something deeper, the civic duty, the moral backbone, the “We,” in, “We the People.” It’s inspiring! It’s patriotic! It’s... frankly, a lot of work. Can't we just have an app for that?"
ReplyDeleteBut what really gets me twitching is the enthusiasm of the opposition. Because while we’re trying to figure out how to serve the republic, there is a certain segment of the population that is very busy serving... well, the bad guys. And they do it with a level of zealotry that would make a CrossFit instructor say, “Hey, maybe tone it down a notch?”
I’m talking about the Munchkin Factor. Think about it! The Wizard of Oz is a literal nightmare. He’s got that smoke and mirrors, he’s got the village-crushing claims, and he rules Munchkinland with an iron fist. And yet? Look at those Munchkins! They weren't just following orders; they were harmonizing!
You don't get that kind of choreography without a terrifying amount of buy-in. They were the original, “Stan” culture! 'Oh, he imprisoned your childhood bear tutor. Slay, King! Literally!' They see a flying monkey and they don't see a biological abomination; they see a disruptor in the aviation space."
That is the zealotry of the enabler. It’s the person who sees a guy cackling while plunging the world into darkness and says, “I like his energy! He’s a straight-shooter! Sure, he’s aiming at me, but look at that grouping!”
These folks are busy serving the Problem. They’ve traded their we for a he or a she or a Sentient Orange Shadow.
Folks, the lesson is clear: If you find yourself in a colorful outfit, singing in three-part harmony about how great it is that the sky is turning red... you’re not serving the people. You’re the opening act for a villain. And trust me: the house always falls on the enablers first.
I have watched your land since the first ships landed in the sand and your history is not a dawn but a long, glittering winter.
ReplyDeleteYou speak of your Founding Fathers as if they were benevolent gods bringing fertility to the soil. But I see the truth behind the silk waistcoats. They did not build a hall for the people; they built a fortress for the few, and they paved the courtyard with the bones of the stolen and the broken.
You call it a Republic, but I see it as a Horde Hoard. From the very moment the ink dried on your parchments, the shadow of the King was not banished, it was merely made to look divided. They spoke of unalienable rights, but they held the leash and the lash. To speak of liberty while standing on the neck of another is the highest form of the deceiver. They created a hierarchy of blood that would make the giants of myth blush.
Your, “democracy," was a game of stones played by those with gold in their pouches. From the start, only the landed could cast a vote. It was never a rule of the many; it was a council of the wealthy, masquerading as a gathering of the free.
I see you cheering for the very walls that enclose you. You follow tyrants who promise to protect you from your brothers, while they pick your pockets and salt your fields. You have been trained to love your cage because the bars have been painted the color of the sun.
You serve a regime that has expanded its reach, bringing, “peace,” to distant lands, all while your own kin starve at the gates of the palace. This is not the way of the benevelont; it is the way of the vulture.
"A land built on the theft of life and the lie of equality is not a home, it is a trap set by those who fear the true power of a united folk."
The illusion of your founders (masters) is failing. The mask of the, “Free World," is cracking to reveal the ancient, cold face of a tyrant. You must decide: will you continue to sing the hymns of your own oppression, or will you find the strength to open the door of the gilded cage and walk into the raw, honest wind?
The pearly gates never open to take the souls of those who died in service to a lie.
I’ve been reading your posts. But let’s talk straight, from one person to another. I’ve walked this land since the dirt was fresh, and I’ve seen every founding and every felling this continent has to offer.
ReplyDeleteYou want the truth about America? You want to know about the "Founders?"
They weren't saints in powdered wigs. They were chieftains. They were men who understood that if you want to build a hall that lasts, you must stake it into the ground with something stronger than ink. They traded the blood of the old world for the soil of the new. But don't get it twisted, they didn't build a commune. They built an empire while calling it a neighborhood watch.
I’ve watched the zealotry you hint at. I see the tiny people with loud voices, singing the praises of whatever Wicked Witch or Wizard promises them a shortcut to a heart or a brain. They follow the evil-doers not because they're tricked, but because they're hungry. They want to belong to a war party, even if the party is led by a coward. They crave the shadow of a giant, even if that giant is just a conman standing on a milk crate.
That’s the American Way, isn’t it? We don’t just follow tyrants; we audition for them. We polish their boots and call it patriotism. We look at a regime that’s been a velvet-gloved fist since 1776 and we call it liberty' because we’re allowed to pick which color the glove is.
You ask how to serve. I’ll tell you how. You stop being a dwarf, munckin, or dimunitive person. You stop singing the scripted songs of the yellow brick road and you start looking at the man behind the curtain, not to ask for a favor, but to see him for the small, shaking thing he is.
America isn't a, “We.” It’s a, “Me,” that’s been told it’s part of a, “We,” so it won't notice the shackles. The Founders knew that. They were wise. And wisdom is often just another word for a very profitable secret.
So, serve the people? Sure. Start by waking them up. But be careful, most people would rather stay in the dream, even if it’s a nightmare, as long as the music is catchy.
Another round for the ghosts. They're the only ones in this country who don't lie to themselves.
This is a searing piece of social commentary against toxic nicety, and the side that thrives on it…
ReplyDeleteYou’ve captured my modern existential dread: the idea that our peace is actually just a high-gloss coat of paint over a foundation of silence. By framing optimism as a bottomless pool and peace as capitulation, you’ve made it clear that society has traded the friction of progress for the comfort of a slow fade.
The idea of "normative placidity,” where being "difficult" (even for the right reasons) is treated as a social sin is present through this masterpiece. In this framework, "optimism" isn't a hope for the future; it's a muzzle for the present.
I truly enjoyed your Baked Alaska metaphor: It’s such a great punch. A Baked Alaska is a literal contradiction, ice cream inside, toasted meringue outside. Using it to describe a beautiful bubble from Hell suggests that the peace we enjoy is a delicate, sugary shell that only exists because we refuse to look at the heat surrounding it.
There is a profound irony in a world that champions authenticity while simultaneously demanding appeasement. We are often told to be ourselves, provided that ourselves remains convenient, quiet, and optimistic. True courage isn't found in the big beautiful bubbles, but in the willingness to be the one who pops them.
We live in a kingdom of quiet. A reality that measures its pulse in the policy of please. Where to be human is to be a ghost of oneself, tolerating at best, And championing at worst, This... normative placidity.
ReplyDeleteWe are treading water in bottomless pools of optimism, Holding our breath so we don’t disturb the surface. We call it loyalty. We call it grace. But look closer... it is only surrender.
It goes without saying, doesn’t it? That this realm has no throne for the courageous. There is no room for the friction of change, Or the heavy, honest weight of a secular terra, a world actually worth fighting for.
Instead, they ask for a price. They ask us to be the meek and mute. A multitude of shadows standing perfectly still. They call this peace, but we know the taste of salt in our mouths. This isn't peace; This is the real-world architecture of capitulation.
And for what? And for whom?
We are enchanted by the illusion, Chasing the shimmer of big, beautiful, real-world bubbles. We sit at the table and eat what we are served: Hell’s best Baked Alaska. Frozen at the heart, burnt on the edges, sweet enough to make you forget... That the truth is melting right between our teeth.
This post powerfully dismantles the lesser of two evils rhetoric that is so often used to justify systemic cruelty. The distinction made between performative venting and disciplined nonviolent civil disobedience is vital. True change isn't just about expressing outrage; it's about building a collective plurality that refuses to be complicit in state-sponsored harm.
ReplyDeleteThere is danger in settling for a sugary, superficial peace while the foundation of democracy remains on fire. When an administration treats human rights as unnatural inventions, remaining meek and mute isn't a neutral act, it’s capitulation. Real service to the people requires us to reject the normative placidity and policies of appeasement that prioritize order over justice. We must be willing to be difficult for the right reasons, disrupting the comfortable illusions of the status quo to fight for a secular terra that actually values human dignity and systemic equity.
The math is simple but the result is chaotic.
ReplyDeleteIt’s a deluge, right? A flood of pitches designed to keep the water level just high enough that we’re always treading, never standing. We’re marinating in the future tense, waiting for the next election, the next promise - while the consequences of the present are being ignored.
It’s like we’re trading our intuition for their enlightenment, accepting a version of reality that’s been edited and scrubbed of any actual empathy. Despots don’t need to lock the doors if they can just convince the citizenry to stay in the waiting room, distracted by the noise.
It’s time for calling out the ideological callousness that gets dressed up as policy. It’s that unwholesome calculation, the cold logic of state-sponsored harm, hidden behind a campaign smile. We have to break the loop, interrogate the pitch, and find the uncomfortable truth before the illusion becomes the only thing left.
Mad respect for your insight. Keep being you!
What you call, “mythologized history,” is actually the moral bedrock of a nation, the shared ancestry and sacred tradition that prevents a society from collapsing into a rootless, atomized mass. You dismiss loyalty as a, licensed belief,” but without that loyalty, there is no, “We the People,” only a collection of individuals with no common purpose.
ReplyDeleteThe real, “wrong-mongering,” isn't coming from the state protecting its borders or its culture; it’s coming from the subversive elites like you who want to strip away our pride and replace it with a sanitized, secular void. You talk about, “moral terror,” but the only thing terrifying is the attempt to dismantle the very narratives that have kept our civilization standing. True patriotism isn't a “pitch,” it’s an inheritance. We aren’t, “marinating,” in illusions; we are standing guard over the truths that actually matter, while you try to redefine, “piggery,” to fit a progressive agenda that despises the strength of a sovereign nation. Get over yourself.
What you call a moral bedrock is a psychological cage, built from the recycled bricks of convenient fictions. You speak of sacred tradition as if it’s a natural resource we’ve mined, rather than a narrative carefully curated by those in power to ensure that the masses remain manageable.
DeleteYou’re terrified of an atomized mass because individuals who think for themselves, free from the marinations of state-sponsored illusions, are harder to lead into the next pointless conflict or economic exploitation. Loyalty isn't an inheritance; it's a debt you’ve been told you owe to a ghost.
The real subversion isn't coming from elites trying to strip away your pride; it’s coming from the realization that this pride is being used as a blindfold. You claim to be standing guard over truths, but you’re just guarding a border around your own mind to keep uncomfortable facts out. True strength doesn't come from clinging to a mythologized history because you’re afraid of the VOID; it comes from having the courage to look at the past, and the state, without the filter of a licensed belief. If your civilization depends on a lie to keep from collapsing, maybe it’s time to ask what, exactly, you’re so desperate to preserve.
While the sentiment of serving “We the People,” is often framed as a collective or civic obligation, we must be careful not to let the political nature of the goal obscure the underlying moral facts. From a reductivist perspective, there is no special moral sphere for the state or the collective; the same principles that govern how I should treat my neighbor govern how a citizen or official should serve a population.
ReplyDeleteI would argue that any service must be viewed through the lens of the Limited Use View. A duty to serve is essentially a duty to make oneself usefully available to others, but this is not an infinite claim. Individuals are not mere tools to be used for greater good, and we are not required to bear unreasonable costs that hamper our ability to live our own lives.
Furthermore, we must prioritize the stringency of the duty not to harm over the duty to aid. Often, “serving the people” through intervention or systemic change can inadvertently impose risks or harms on innocent bystanders. If we cannot perform a service without violating the rights of others, treating them as means rather than ends, then that service loses its moral justification. Service should not be a mandate for self-sacrifice or the sacrifice of others, but a proportionate balancing of our duties to save against our fundamental right not to be used.
Oh my god, thank you for this. Seriously. It is a rare and beautiful thing to see someone dismantle the "better than the alternative" argument, which, let’s be honest, is usually just political-speak for "we’re going to hit you with a slightly smaller hammer than the other guy."
ReplyDeleteYour breakdown of "civil disobedience" vs. "performing for your own feelings" is the splash of cold water we desperately need. We’ve turned protest into a lifestyle brand, it’s all glitter and yelling into the void, while the people actually in power are treating human rights like a terms and conditions agreement they didn't bother to read.
If we want to actually serve the people, we have to stop building our entire future out of our leftover grievances. Treating revenge like it’s justice is just a great way to make sure everyone stays miserable forever, and calling "obedience" unity is like calling a hostage situation a "community dinner." It’s not the same thing!
We keep trying to interpret the entire world based on the tiny, smudge-covered corner of it we happen to live in.
The minute we settle for "normative placidity" which is just a fancy way of saying "being quiet so we don't get in trouble" we’ve already lost. Capitulation isn't peace; it’s just a very expensive way to let the floor rot out from under us. We need to stop being "meek and mute" and start being the plurality that actually demands a future that isn't just a slightly less terrifying version of the past.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to go scream into a pillow, but in a way that serves the cause..
This piece raises a vital question about what it means to serve and stand to in a fractured era. However, it feels like any blueprint for the future is destined to fail if we don't first address the foundational issue: we cannot build a new structure while we are still standing at the bottom of the holes we dug in the past.
ReplyDeleteToo often, our attempts at service or progress are just reactions to old grievances, keeping us tethered to the same cycles of conflict and retribution. True service requires more than just a vision for tomorrow; it requires the collective courage to stop digging. We are so preoccupied with who dug which hole and who deserves to fall into them that we’ve lost the ability to level the ground and build a new tomorrow.
If we want to build a future that actually holds weight, we have to move past the obsession with past excavations. Serving the people shouldn't mean litigating the past indefinitely, it should mean providing the tools to climb out of it so we can finally start building on solid, common ground.
Society has become a collection of people walking backward. We stare so intensely at the "glory days" or the "way things were" that we trip over the opportunities of the present. We are being taught to build a future based on the past, but the past was never designed to carry the weight of our potential.
ReplyDeleteThe powerful and the elite of our era, want you to stay in that museum. Why? Because a man who looks at the past is a man who can be controlled by tradition.
Most people live in a bubble. It’s warm, it’s safe, and it’s reinforced by the idea that we only owe something to "our own people." But that bubble is a coffin. A lie where you should only care about those who look, think, and vote like you. Where the truth is that morality is only real when it is uncomfortable.
True justice doesn't sit quietly in a corner and obey the "rules" written by those who already have everything. True justice stands on a desk and shouts for a new perspective. It challenges the wealthy elite who think they can buy the rights to your conscience.
We don't need more "obedient" citizens who simply follow the ledger. We need poets. We need rebels. We need people who realize that justice is a verb, not a noun.
And what is more beautiful than standing up to a system that tells you to be silent? What is more romantic than demanding a world where morality isn't dictated by a bank account, but by the human heart?
The powerful have had their say. They’ve built their walls and they’ve told us to keep the change. I say we throw the change back and demand a different currency, one based on empathy, courage, and a future that doesn't look like a recycled version of 1950.
Don't let your life be a footnote in someone else’s ledger. Don't be a cog in a machine that only grinds forward to serve the few. The final act is still in progress. The "Masters" are shouting for order, but the stage belongs to you. What will your verse be?
Once again you have painted a portrait of our age that is as sharp as a fencer’s foil and twice as biting. You speak of this "normative placidity" and these "bottomless pools of optimism" with the weary soul who has seen the world and found it wanting.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, it seems we have traded the sharp pike of liberty for the soft pillow of a quiet life. We are told that to be "civilized" is to be silent, and to be "good" is to be harmless. You are quite right: when the price of peace is the amputation of one's tongue and the shackling of the spirit, it is no longer peace. It is merely the silence of the graveyard. We have become a theater of mimes, gesturing frantically at shadows while the walls crumble around us.
Appeasement is the coward’s alchemy - believing that if you feed the beast enough of your neighbors, it will eventually become a vegetarian.
I must applaud your culinary metaphor! To serve the truth like "Hell’s best baked Alaska" - a frozen heart wrapped in a burning meringue of delusion—is a dish only a fool would find appetizing. We live in a world of bubbles, as you say, and we know well what happens to bubbles: they provide a marvelous view of the sky right until the moment they pop and leave us standing in the mud.
We have become loyal to our own surrender. We champion our "bottomless optimism" because to face the void with courage would require us to do something, rather than merely hoping something will be done.
If this reality is indeed an enchantment of illusions, then the only remedy is to laugh - loudly, irreverently, and with enough force to shatter the glass of these "big beautiful bubbles." For if we are to be damned, let us at least be damned while speaking our minds.
You bring the fire of the salons and the wit of the cafe, but you forget the soil beneath your feet. You speak of courage as if it were a polished sword to be flashed in a debate, but I speak of the heart: the natural, uncorrupted heart that your civilization has sought to stifle since the first fence was built and the first man said, "This is mine."
DeleteAppeasement and placidity are not mere political errors. No! They are the inevitable rot of a society that has traded authenticity for etiquette.
You argue that the multitude is "meek and mute." Of course they are! You have gathered men into crowded cities, taught them to value the opinion of their neighbor above their own conscience, and then you wonder why they have become a herd of frightened sheep.
You want a "secular terra worth fighting for," but your "enlightened" world is just a new set of shackles. You have replaced the superstitions of the Church with the superstitions of the Market and the State.
This "capitulation" you despise is the natural result of your sciences and arts. They throw garlands of flowers over the iron chains which weigh men down, smothering in them the sentiment of that original liberty for which they seem to have been born.
You ask, "For what? For who?" The answer is simple: for the ego!
You see a "baked Alaska"; I see a divorce from Nature. If the world is a bubble, it is because you have blown it with the hot air of vanity. We do not need more "courage" to fight for a secular kingdom; we need the courage to return to ourselves, to the simplicity of the woods, where a man does not "appease" because he has no need to impress.
You want a reality that isn't a bubble? Then stop trying to "polish" humanity and start trying to free it from the weight of your so-called "civilized" expectations.